Could the N-body problem be a macroscopic manifestation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?

- Thread starter Carl James Mesaros
- Start date

Could the N-body problem be a macroscopic manifestation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?

The Heisenberg principle is best described, to my mind, using the wave picture of QM and represents the impossibilty of precise measurement of the position of the wave due to the nature of the wave tending to spread out.

Could the N-body problem be a macroscopic manifestation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?

The N-body problem is due to the lack of existence of closed form solutions to the equations of motion.

These are very different things.

-Dan

Can you explain what you think the N-body problem is? Also describe what you think the Heisenberg uncertainty principle says.

Could the N-body problem be a macroscopic manifestation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?

The N-body problem is due to the lack of existence of closed form solutions to the equations of motion.

These are very different things.

-Dan

The fundamental reason why I equated the N-body problem with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is that both deal with events (with the Heisenberg Principle of the microworld and the N-body problem of the macroworld) that cannot be predicted.

This is why I asked the question I did. You seem to be having a fundamental misunderstanding of both the N body problem and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Neither the N-body problem or the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle has anything to do with, or makes any statements about "events that cannot be predicted". Your question seemed familiar and after checking it seems you asked something similar in September. Rather than rewriting the same reply I did back then, here is the link. Please read the comments that topsquark and myself (and others) made in that thread.

The fundamental reason why I equated the N-body problem with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is that both deal with events (with the Heisenberg Principle of the microworld and the N-body problem of the macroworld) that cannot be predicted.

Just to be clear on the N-body problem: There is no uncertainty there. We can make numerical predictions with just about any accuracy desired, at least in the short term. Yes, there are possible chaotic effects but unless you are trying to predict something to happen in 1000 years or can invent/use equipement that can make measurements far better than we have now the numerical work will do you just fine. It seems to work well enough for NASA and other country's space agencies.

-Dan

Oops thanks for that. I am spoiled on google telling me when I have used the word "attached" in an email but haven't attached anything. Saves me from looking stupid ~10x a day but it only promotes bad habits.SDK lost the link somehow. Here it is.

Similar Math Discussions | Math Forum | Date |
---|---|---|

The n-body problem revisited | Physics | |

The N-Body problem, what can we know? | Physics | |

Doubt with a free body diagram problem | Physics | |

Differentiation Problem Can Anybody Help | Calculus |